92d Congress, 2d Session
Download Full Text (2.0 MB)
This court case, decided on January 17, 1972, established that the act of 1910 which allowed for the sale of “surplus” lands on the Fort Berthold Reservation after allotment did not change the jurisdictional boundaries of the reservation, meaning that the reservation proper still includes the northeast quadrant.
Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, Mandan, Nueta, Hidatsa, Gros Ventre, Arikara, Sahnish, Department of the Interior, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jon R. Kerian, Bosard McCutcheon, Kerian Schmidt, Thomas L. Adams Jr., Shiro Kashiwa, Harold O. Bullis, Robert S. Lynch Jerry C. Straus, Cragun Bareker, Charles A. Hobbs, R. Anthony Rogers, George S. Register, Glen Snowbird, John Crow
Government Printing Office
American Politics | Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law | Indigenous Studies | Law and Politics | Native American Studies | United States History
The City of New Town, North Dakota v. United States, 454 F.2d 121 (1972). https://commons.und.edu/indigenous-gov-docs/138/.
Cultural Institutions Notice
Collections and items in our institution have incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing attribution. We are using this notice to clearly identify this material so that it can be updated, or corrected by communities of origin. Our institution is committed to collaboration and partnerships to address this problem of incorrect or missing attribution.
Open to Collaborate
Our institution is committed to the development of new modes of collaboration, engagement, and partnership for the care and stewardship of past and future heritage collections.