The City of New Town, North Dakota v. U.S

Authors

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Congress

92d Congress, 2d Session

Files

Description

This court case, decided on January 17, 1972, established that the act of 1910 which allowed for the sale of “surplus” lands on the Fort Berthold Reservation after allotment did not change the jurisdictional boundaries of the reservation, meaning that the reservation proper still includes the northeast quadrant.

Publication Date

1-17-1972

Organizations Referenced

Mandan Hidatsa and Arikara Nation, the Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation, Mandan, Nueta, Hidatsa, Gros Ventre, Arikara, Sahnish, Department of the Interior, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

People Referenced

Jon R. Kerian, Bosard McCutcheon, Kerian Schmidt, Thomas L. Adams Jr., Shiro Kashiwa, Harold O. Bullis, Robert S. Lynch Jerry C. Straus, Cragun Bareker, Charles A. Hobbs, R. Anthony Rogers, George S. Register, Glen Snowbird, John Crow

Publisher

Government Printing Office

Disciplines

American Politics | Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law | Indigenous Studies | Law and Politics | Native American Studies | United States History

Related Documents

An Act to Authorize the Survey and Allotment of Lands Embraced within the Limits of the Fort Berthold Indian Reservation, in the State of North Dakota, and the Sale and Disposition of a Portion of the Surplus Lands after Allotment, and Making Appropriations and Provisions to Carry the Same into Effect

Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes (1992)

Duncan Energy v. Three Affiliated Tribes (1994)

Recommended Citation

The City of New Town, North Dakota v. United States, 454 F.2d 121 (1972). https://commons.und.edu/indigenous-gov-docs/138/.