Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-29-2024
Publication Title
Open Praxis
Volume
16
Abstract
This study examined faculty and student perceptions of renewable assignments within an OER-enabled pedagogy framework. Building on Wiley and Hilton’s (2018) framework, this study focused on the subset of practices that result in renewable assignments. Renewable assignments leverage OER permissions (reuse, redistribute, retain, remix, revise) to produce student work with value beyond the classroom. The study compared college students’ (N = 24) perceptions of value, interest, motivation, and reward for renewable assignments versus those of the instructor (N = 1) in one online class. Students reported that the value, interest, motivation, and reward of the renewable assignment were somewhat better than traditional assignments. However, the professor viewed the renewable assignment as more rewarding than the students did. In open-ended responses, students indicated that the benefits of the renewable assignment were enhanced motivation and the development of teamwork skills. However, students also indicated that the drawbacks of the renewable assignment were challenges with their group and that the project was lengthy and complicated. Overall, students and the instructor recognized the potential value of renewable assignments as well as their challenges. Recommendations include highlighting the importance of careful design and clear communication when implementing such assignments.
Issue
4
First Page
514
Last Page
525
DOI
10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.706
ISSN
2304-070X
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Julie Lazzara, Matthew Bloom, and Virginia Clinton-Lisell. "Renewable Assignments: Comparing Faculty and Student Perceptions" (2024). Education, Health & Behavior Studies Faculty Publications. 85.
https://commons.und.edu/ehb-fac/85