Download Full Text (678 KB)
This United States (US) Supreme Court case, decided June 14, 1976, provided clarity on the jurisdiction granted by US Public Law 280 in regard to taxation of the personal property of reservation Indians. In 1972, petitioner Russell Bryan, enrolled member of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe residing on the Leech Lake Reservation in Minnesota, received a notice of taxation on his home from Itasca County, Minnesota. Bryan filed suit to Minnesota district court which ruled in favor of Itasca County. Although US Public Law 280 does not specifically address taxation, the district court based its decision on US Public Law 280, holding that because the law does not specifically exempt taxation of personal property. The case went to the Minnesota Supreme court which ruled the same. The US Supreme Court agreed to review the case and reversed the decision of the lower courts. The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Bryan, holding that the intention of US Public Law 280 was to allow for states to assume jurisdiction over criminal suits and not to authorize taxation of personal property of enrolled members of federally recognized tribes living on tribal trust land. William J. Brennan delivered the opinion of the court.
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Anishinaabe, Ojibwe, US Supreme Court, MN Supreme Court, lawsuit, jurisdiction, Public Law 280, taxation, taxation of personal property, gaming, casino
Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Anishinaabe, Ojibwe, US Supreme Court, MN Supreme Court
Russell Bryan, Bernard P. Becker, Gerald L. Seck, Michael Hagedorn, Daniel H. Israel, C.H. Luther, Warren Spannaus, Paul R. Kempainen, Steven G. Thorne
Government Printing Office
American Politics | Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law | Indigenous Studies | Law and Politics | Native American Studies | United States History
Bryan v. Itasca County 426 U.S. 373 (1976). https://commons.und.edu/indigenous-gov-docs/122/.
Cultural Institutions Notice
Collections and items in our institution have incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing attribution. We are using this notice to clearly identify this material so that it can be updated, or corrected by communities of origin. Our institution is committed to collaboration and partnerships to address this problem of incorrect or missing attribution.
Open to Collaborate
Our institution is committed to the development of new modes of collaboration, engagement, and partnership for the care and stewardship of past and future heritage collections.