Jason Trainer

Date of Award

January 2016

Document Type


Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)


Educational Leadership

First Advisor

Margaret A. Healy


Increasing institutional dependency on tuition revenue paired with rising political pressures towards student success outcomes has many institutions turning to enrollment management (EM) to improve their institution’s enrollment outcomes. EM is a comprehensive and inclusive process focused on achieving the optimum recruitment, retention, and graduation institutional outcomes. The academic community remains at the epicenter of this EM process. Chief enrollment officers failing to create an institutional partnership with the academic community will unlikely attain desired enrollment outcomes.

This study seeks to assist institutions by assessing how a “shared sense of responsibility” for enrollment outcomes is developed through the eyes of both chief enrollment officers (CEnO) and key academic partners (KAP). In order to identify high-performing institutions practicing enrollment management, the SEM Health Assessment survey is sent to 385 public four-year institutions across the United States comprising the 22 regional affiliate associations of National Association of College Admission Counselors (NACAC). Once high-performing institutions are identified, the researcher interviewed 20 participants from 12 institutions including 12 CEnOs and eight KAPs. This study is designed with a constructivist grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis.

The findings of this study suggest, institutions that are successfully drawing the academic community into their EM process do so by engaging EM at two levels of the institution, the central and local. This dual-level approach to EM creates the optimum environment for developing a “shared sense of responsibility” for enrollment outcomes with the academic units. In order for each level to effectively work together, two institutional conditions must be established: credibility and transparency. Credibility is composed of executive support, data-informed decisions, and academic positioning. Transparency is composed of clear purposes and goals, open communication, and adequate opportunities for input and feedback. Each element should be addressed; however, the degree of importance of each element is tied to internal and external environmental influencers.